Hinduism: Details about 'Shahs'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home
|
Shah is an Iranian term (Persian and Kurdish) for king, and has also been adopted in many other languages. It is either actually used as a princely style or to render original Near Eastern styles. It also appears in various derived titles.
Ruling ShahsNominal ShahsVarious Iranian monarchies, and other imitating that example, used the royal title Shah. This has been the case in Afghanistan, but in great confusion- the style was used by local rulers, e.g. in Herat, or by the national King, by each time inconsistently alternating with other styles (for the central throne including Malik, rather equivalent Arabic for King, and Padshah, a Persian-language imperial title). Subsidiary useShah-i-Bangalah was a subsidiary title, adopted by Sultan Shamsuddin Ilyas shah (1342-1357 AD), the Sultan of Bengal who united that state (the use of shah in the name itself, as here, is not titular, and rarely significant) Even non-Muslim dynasties could adopt this royal style. Thus Shah (or Shaha) is a title borne by the Hindu Maharajadhiraja (King of Kings) of Nepal and his male-line descendants, which was originally conferred as a title by the Muslim Sultan of Delhi on Kulananda Khan, after he made himself ruler of Kaski. Also borne by several families descended from rulers of certain Nepali vassal principalities. The folowing derived or compound titles designate an even higher rank then just Shah: ShahanshahHowever, especially in western languages, Shah is mainly used as an imprecise rendering of Shahanshah (meaning King of Kings), usually shortened to Shah (Persian: شاه), from the ancestral parent language of modern Persian and Kurdish, the Old Persian of Indo-European origin meaning khashaayathaiya ("king"), and popularly referred to as "basileus toon basileoon" by the Greeks, is the term for a Iranian monarch and was used by most of the former rulers of the Iranian empires and later Kurdish rulers (such as the Kurdish -at the time referred to as Kordan- 'Shahi Madrig Madrig' the King who rebelled against his Sassanid overlord), Persian kings, Indian monarchs, and Afghan kings amongst many nationalities of Iranian origin or cultural influence. The term of Shah or Shahanshah has roughly corresponded to Persia and Kurdistan since the Achaemenid Persian Empire (which had succeeded and absorbed the Mede state) or properly Iranian Empire, after its conquest by Alexander the Great transposed in Greek as Basileus toon basiloon, also often shortened to Basileus. The title is roughly equivalent in rank to a Western Emperor and is hence often translated as such in English and its equivalent in other languages. The Monarch of Persia (internally always called Iran) was technically the Emperor of the Persian Empire (later the Empire of Iran, as Iran was officially known until 1935). However until the Napoleonic era, when Persia was an enviable ally for Western powers eager to make the Ottoman Great Sultan release his hold on various -mainly Christian, European- parts of the Turkish empire, and Western (Christian) Emperors had obtained the Ottoman aknowlegdement that their Western imperial styles were to be rendered in Turkish as Padishah, the Western practice was to consider 'King of Kings' a particular but royal title, The last Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi officially adopted the title شاهنشاه Shâhanshâh (literally "King of Kings") and in Western languages the rendering as "Emperor", during his coronation. He also styled his wife شاهبانو Shahbânu ("Empress").
Shah bahadurIn the Mughal tradition, the addition of bahadur raises any title one rank, so this means something untranslatable such as 'King first class'. Yet this title was adopted as part of the full style of the former Nawab (vassal 'govenor') of Awadh (the richest remaining province in the Mughal empire, and geographically close to its Delhi capital; often Oudh in English) and Mughal 'regent plenipotentiary (de facto Viceroy) when he followed the British advice to declare himself independent from the completely weakened Mughal court- only to become the political toy of the eager coloniser. However the crucial element is his majestic full style -Hazrat Khalid, (personal reign name and titles) Shah Bahadur, Padshah-i-Oudh- is the imperial title Padishah, which could not conceivably be allowed to be assumed by a vassal. Related and subsidiary princely titlesRuler styles
ShahzadaIn the realm of a Shah (or a more lofty derived ruler style), a prince of blood were logically called Shahzada as the term is derived from Shah using the Persian patronymic suffix -zada, "son, descendant"; see "Prince" article for other uses of the suffix.However the precise full styles can differ 'creatively' in the court traditions of each Shah's 'kingdom'.
Furthermore the title was also used for princes of the blood of a ruler who used an alternative royal style, e.g. the Malik (Arabic for King, so equivalent) of AfghanistanIn the Ottoman dynasty of imperial Turkey, it was part of two styles:
This could even apply to non-Muslim dynasties, e.g. the younger sons of the ruling Sikh Maharaja of Punjab (in Lahore; a Maharajadhiraja): Shahzada (personal name) Singh Bahadur, while the heir Apparent was styled Tika Sahib Bahadur
Other usesAs many titles, the word Shah is also often used in names, without a political or aristocratic meaning. The English words check, checkmate (with the Semitic root "mata" – to die) and chess are all derived from Shah.
See also
Sources and References
Шах (титла) Shah Schah Sha Chah 샤 Šah (vladar) שאה შაჰი Sachus Sjah シャー Sjah Xá Šah (vladar) Shaahi Shah شاه
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||